Main menu

Syllabus

 

Syllabus Navigation

Course Format
Course Description
Course Objectives
Course Schedule
Description of Assignments
Basis for Grading
Classroom Civility
Disability Services
Academic Integrity
Writing Quality

Access syllabus here
Course Format
This course will be delivered fully online. We will spend two hours each week working synchronously in Zoom and one hour engaged in other digital activities related to the course. I will share the Zoom link for our weekly meeting in a private e-mail to the class.
Expanded Course Description
SSW 751 is the first part of a two-semester course in practice-based research methods. In this course students learn basic research techniques that can be used to build knowledge, assess the effectiveness of social work and other program interventions, improve practice at all levels, and empower communities, organizations, groups, as well as individual workers and clients. 

Major concepts within the realm of empirical research are examined, including problem identification and formulation, literature review, research design, sampling, definitions and measurement of variables, and instrument construction. Emphasis is placed on the use of empirical research to inform practice as well as on the development of knowledge for and from practice. The major goal is to enhance the student’s capacity to identify problems and reach empirical conclusions about their practice through research. Quantitative and qualitative research approaches are emphasized equally as strategies for evaluating one’s practice.

Discussions of issues concerning ethnicity, race, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, disability and concerns of subjugated populations are essential features of this course. Attention to these issues is integrated throughout all stages of the research process, including problem identification, research design, sampling, measurement, data analysis, and interpretation of findings. Ethical issues regarding human subjects as well as federally mandated procedures for protection of human subjects including the institutional review board are also discussed. 

This substantial scope will be achieved through use of real world political, contextual, research, and evaluation challenges faced by organizations and communities. Throughout the two-semester sequence, each student will complete an individual or group research project. The research may be based in student field placements or agencies of employment and will consist of original research or secondary analysis of publicly available data on a topic pertinent to the student’s career goals.
Course Objectives
At the end of this semester, students will demonstrate that they have mastered the basic knowledge and skills in research methodology through completion of linked assignments and a final research proposal. Students will be able to:
  1. Conduct a comprehensive review of the academic and grey literature, and critically evaluate this information as it pertains to a specified research or evaluation project.
  2. Identify, conceptualize, and formulate a research or evaluation problem from their own practice on which to conduct an empirical study.
  3. State clear and precise research questions or hypotheses (if appropriate) for research or evaluation projects.
  4. Identify appropriate study design and methods for quantitative and qualitative research or evaluation projects.
  5. Discern appropriate sampling approaches for research or evaluation projects.
  6. Choose appropriate data collection method(s) for research or evaluation projects.
  7. Demonstrate sensitivity to issues of power, positionality, and potential biases in conducting research with culturally diverse populations (including race, ethnicity, language, country of origin or citizenship, gender identity, age, sexual orientation, physical or intellectual disabilities, etc.). 
  8. Obtain certification of online training from the Hunter College Human Research Protection Program (HRPP).
  9. Demonstrate ability to incorporate ongoing feedback (constructive critique) to ensure continuous improvement in social work practice at the micro, meso, and macro levels.
Description of Assignments
The assignments for this course are intended to build on one another leading to a culminating paper in the form of a literature review and draft research proposal. The nature of research is iterative so expect that there will be shifts in your thinking and in your project as you go through the year. The ideal is for some students to design a study in the fall and implement it in the spring. Others will find that circumstances beyond their control result in designing a study in the fall, and moving to a different, back-up (group or individual) study in the spring. 

Subjectivity Statement 
The purpose of this assignment is twofold: i) to identify relevant subject positions that you bring to your topic(s) of interest and ii) discuss the potential implications of your subjectivities for the conduct of your research (these include potential limitations and benefits). Consider your subject positions and subjectivities. After completing the required readings on subjectivity and reviewing examples of subjectivity statements on Blackboard, write a 1-3 page (double spaced, APA format) subjectivity statement that examines who you are as a researcher and the implications of your subject positions for conducting research on your chosen topic(s). This might include any number of positionalities related to your research interests, including but not limited to race, ethnicity, class, nationality, languages spoken, education, age, gender identity, sexual orientation, professional background, etc. 

Online CITI training for Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) 
Please follow the steps outlined below to complete your training:
  1. Log-in (or register if you are a first-time user) at https://www.citiprogram.org/Default.asp**If you are registering for a new account, click on “create an account” and search for CUNY as your institution.
  2. Click on “Add a course or update your learner groups”
  3. Select the curriculum which you need to complete: Basic Course-HSR for Social and Behavioral (Faculty, Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars)
  4. Complete the required modules
  5. Save your certificate so that you can submit it electronically to the instructor (or if necessary to the Institutional Review Board).

Research Article Summary/Critique 
Select a peer reviewed article summarizing an empirical study on a topic of interest to you. Describe and critique the article using the points below. Briefly summarize the article in class along with your critique (in a 5-8 minute recorded presentation uploaded to the Course Blog)

The assignment must address the following guiding points/questions

  • Author and title of the article (citation and full APA reference), including any information on how the study was funded.
  • What was the primary aim of the study, and what was the study design?
  • What was the primary research question? Was a hypothesis presented in the article? Why or why not?
  • Briefly describe (and critique where necessary) the study methods (sampling, data collection strategies, and instruments).
  • What were the results of the study?
  • Strengths/limitations of the article, including ethical implications. 
  • Thoughts regarding next steps and implications for research, policy, and/or practice?

Problem Statement with Literature Review
A comprehensive review of the relevant literature on the research problem locates your topic within the context of an existing body of knowledge and lays a foundation for any next steps you and your constituents plan to take with your research or advocacy efforts. The literature may include the following: scholarly literature in peer-reviewed journals, grey literature, including reputable internet sourced materials such as research reports, policy reports. 

The literature review should include at least 10 articles, of which at least five are empirical research studies which can (in problem focus, design, instrumentation and/or findings) inform your study. Please provide a literature summary chart of the purpose/question, target population, instruments, key findings for each study.

 

Basis for Grading
The assignments are as follows (written assignments and certificates of completion are submitted through Blackboard’s “SUBMIT an Assignment” section):
1. Subjectivity statement: 5% of grade
2. Completion of the CITI human subjects protection training: 5% of grade
3. Research article summary/critique: 15% of grade
4. Draft problem statement: 15% of grade
5. Literature review and proposed next steps: 30% of grade
6. Class participation and attendance, including Blackboard and other online forums: 30% of grade

Classroom Civility 

As a professional school, standards of appropriate ethical conduct are expected of students at all times, including in the classroom. We will review examples and affirm community learning needs and values during our first class.

Students should refrain from texting and from answering or making cell phone calls in class, or from browsing the internet (for content unrelated to class) on any portable electronic devices while in class.

Students are expected to comply with the College’s policies and regulations outlined in the Campus Code of Conduct and Student Handbook.

In accordance with the emphasis on ethical conduct in the social work profession, students are expected to incorporate the highest ethical standards in every element of their work and to conduct themselves in ways that manifest the maturity and emotional stability necessary to function as professionals.

Examples of poor academic performance and misconduct that will subject the student to disciplinary action or dismissal from the program includes the following:

  1. Violations of the College policy on Academic Integrity (e.g., plagiarism).
  2. Behavior determined to be a violation of College or School policies or regulations.
  3. Behavior determined to be a violation of the profession’s ethics (e.g., the NASW Code of Ethics).
  4. Behaviors that do not meet professional expectations and standards, which include generally accepted standards of professional conduct, personal integrity, or emotional stability.
  5. Behaviors determined to be unprofessional conduct towards colleagues, faculty, or staff.

Accommodations for Students with Disabilities
In compliance with the ADA and with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, Hunter is committed to ensuring educational access and accommodations for all its registered students. Hunter College’s students with disabilities and medical conditions are encouraged to register with the Office of AccessABILITY for assistance and accommodation.  For information and appointment contact the Office of AccessABILITY located in Room E1214 or call (212) 772-4857 /or TTY (212) 650-3230
If you are a student who has been certified for accommodations through the Office of AccessABILITY, please touch base early on so that a plan to assure your needed accommodations can be made.

Academic Integrity
Academic integrity is a guiding principle of the Hunter College learning community because all students should have the opportunity to learn and perform on a level playing field.

Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, obtaining an unfair advantage, and falsifying records or documents (see examples) whether intentional or not.

Hunter College upholds the right to promote academic integrity on its campus as an educational institution of the City University of New York. The College has the responsibility to review all charges of academic dishonesty and implement sanctions, including, but not limited to, failing the course, official transcript notation, suspension or expulsion from the College when it has been determined that academic dishonesty did occur. 
Because this is a second year graduate course, failure to appropriately cite sources or representing the work of others as one’s own will be grounds for the grade of NO CREDIT or “F” and a report to the College. You are encouraged to submit your assignments to Turnitin or Safe Assign (on Blackboard) so you can assess the extent of originality of your work.

Please review the WRITING PROGRAM’s handouts and on line materials available in the Information Corner on Blackboard. There is a wealth of information and support for writers at all levels. Ask questions in advance if you are unsure how to properly cite material. https://sssw.hunter.cuny.edu/studentservices/writing-program.   


Writing Quality

Students graduating the MSW program enter the professional practice and research arena and are expected to communicate orally and in writing at a professional level. This includes care in preparation of written materials, responsiveness to guidelines, as well as appropriate skill in language usage. Unedited, misspelled, grammatically incorrect, or carelessly organized work is not appropriate or creditable.   There will be writing assistance available to help.  Please contact the Office of Student Services promptly if your own self-evaluation or faculty evaluation reveals a need to improve skills. You will also find many online resources via Silberman’s Writing Program: https://sssw.hunter.cuny.edu/studentservices/writing-program/

Referencing and citation of all written work throughout this course should be according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA), 7th Edition. Full referencing and citations are expected in all written work.

 

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes

Skip to toolbar